THE Berean
Bible Ministry

The Resurrection of Jesus

Did it Really Happen? Does it Really Matter?

Come Resurrection Sunday, or Easter as most people call it, Christians around the
world celebrate the bodily resurrection of Jesus. They sing those familiar hymns,
with lines such as “Christ the Lord is risen today, Alleluia! Earth and heaven in
chorus say, Alleluia! Raise your joys and triumphs high, Alleluia!” But really, not
everyone believes that Jesus, let alone anyone else, could come back from the
dead. Even some pastors don’t take these verses literally. They might teach it
because it is a tradition, that it is based on a myth or that it brings some comfort to
parishioners. Certainly, skeptics don’t believe it. They might refer to the story of
the resurrection of Jesus as a myth, an example of wishful thinking, a product of
hallucinations, or a pious fraud on the part of the disciples.

But did the resurrection of Jesus really happen? Does it really matter? 1 Peter 15-
16 tells us, “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to
give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and
respect.” We should be able to explain, using reason, not feelings, what we believe
and why we believe it. So, why should we believe that Jesus rose from the dead?

There are some things, such as one-time historical events, that can’t be proven
scientifically. You can repeat the incident. But you can make a reasonable
argument for the resurrection of Jesus. And this argument is more reasonable than
any alternative explanation.

Some skeptics might suggest that the resurrection was not a historical fact, but a
legend, a story that developed over the years. This is a very weak argument.
Legends can’t develop overnight. They develop years after the event. And the
record of the events (The Gospels) were written within a decade or two of the
events, far too early for such legends to develop.

Another argument against the resurrection of Jesus was that the story was
fabricated by his disciples. This argument doesn’t make much sense either. People
will lie if the lie will benefit them in some way. They lie to get rich or to gain
power. But all of the disciples suffered for what they were teaching and all but
John died as martyrs. Would you suffer and die for what you knew was a lie? I
doubt it.

Then there is the idea that the disciples stole the body of Jesus and claimed that
Jesus rose from the dead. This is unlikely considering the disciples were not the
heroic types who would steal a body from a grave that was guarded by Roman
soldiers. The disciples abandoned Jesus and scattered when Jesus was arrested.
They were in hiding, thinking that perhaps they were next to be arrested. Peter was
ready to move on with his life saying that he was going back to the fishing
business (John 21:3). Imagine what might have been going through the minds of
the disciples at that time. “We really thought he was the one, the Messiah. But then
John the Baptist was killed, and then Jesus. Now the authorities are probably going
to come after us. And that loudmouth Peter who cut off that soldiers’ ear is
probably at the top of the authorities list of their most wanted criminals.” I don’t
think this was the time for them to plan and execute a commando raid on a heavily
guarded tomb to steal a body. They probably were more likely to be planning an
escape from Jerusalem altogether. No, the disciples weren’t going to try to steal the
body and claim that Jesus rose from the dead and then suffer and die for what they
knew was a lie.

What about the enemies of Jesus? Could the Jews have stolen the body of Jesus?
No, because when Peter preached his sermon on Pentecost and spoke of the risen
Christ, all the Jews would have had to do was to produce the body of Jesus and
debunk Peter’s claim of a resurrection. If that happened, we would never have
heard of Jesus or any of his disciples. The Christian message would have died
before it spread beyond the walls of Jerusalem.

What about the women who were the first to discover the empty tomb? Could the
women, on their way to the tomb to prepare Jesus for permanent burial gotten lost
in the early morning fog and gone to the wrong tomb, an empty one? Unlikely,
since there was an angel at the tomb who announced that Jesus wasn’t in his tomb,
that he had risen. You would have to think that the angel got lost in the fog, also.
Besides, when the women reported to the disciples what they saw, the disciples ran
to investigate their claim. You would have to believe that they too got disorientated
and went to the wrong tomb, which just happened to have an empty burial shroud
inside.

Then there is the theory that Jesus never died in the first place. Claimants argue
that Jesus was only unconscious when he was placed in the tomb, not dead. People
have been buried alive. With no stethoscopes, electrocardiograms to measure heart
rhythms, no electroencephalograms to measure brain waves, he might have been
alive when he was placed in the tomb. And once in the cool, quiet tomb, he was
able to rest, and regain consciousness. Then he might have unwrapped himself and
moved the stone away and escaped the guard under the cover of darkness. This
might be a good story line for an adventure movie but doesn’t make much sense.
Before his crucifixion Jesus had to endure a horrible beating, a scourging. This
included being whipped with a whip that had metal pieces bone fragments in it so
that his flesh would be torn from his body. Some condemned prisoners didn’t
survive the scourging. Jesus was in such terrible shape that he couldn’t even carry
his cross to his crucifixion. Besides this scourging, he wasn’t executed by amateurs
but by professional soldiers. They had seen death many times and knew it when
they saw it, and just to be sure he was dead, they thrust a spear into his side. If your
military specialty was “executioner”, you wanted to do a thorough job so that your
annual performance evaluation looked good, and you get that promotion you want.
There was no doubt that he was dead when he was wrapped up and placed in a
sealed and guarded tomb.

When skeptics are desperate for arguments to disprove the resurrection of Jesus,
they resort to most any idea. The twin theory argues that Jesus may not have been
the one who was crucified, but a twin. But Jesus was guarded by Roman soldiers
from the time he was taken into custody until his death and afterwards. There was
no chance for a twin or anyone else to sneak in and take his place. Nor could a
“twin” steal his body and claim to be the risen Lord.

Then there is the question about spices and body wrapping of Jesus after his death.
Could a person who had been badly beaten and wrapped in cloth have unwrapped
himself? Houdini couldn’t have escaped this tomb. When his disciples entered the
empty tomb and found it empty, the spices and wrappings were still there. And the
wrappings were in the same shape as if the body had passed through it, as if by a
miracle. Would a thief take the time to unwrap the body? Most thieves want to get
in and out as quickly as possible. And why would they leave behind the spices that
were quite valuable?

If the resurrection story was nothing more than a conspiracy of lies, isn’t it unlikely
that not a single conspirator divulged their secret?

Then you have the multiple testimonies of those who saw the risen Christ. How
can a skeptic reasonably explain the testimonies of so many people? Jesus was
seen by more than 500 people on at least eight occasions over a forty-day period.
He appeared to Mary Magdalene (John 20:11), the “other woman” (Matt. 28:9-
10), to Peter (Luke 24:34), to two disciples (Luke 24:13-32), to ten
apostles (Luke 24:33-49), to doubting Thomas (John 20:26-30), to seven
apostles (John 21), to all the apostles (Matt. 28:16-20), to all the apostles
again (Acts 1:4-9), to 500 brethren (I Cor 15:6), to James (I Cor 15:6), and to
Paul (I Cor 15:7). Paul said that there were people still alive in his day who could
attest to the fact that Jesus rose from the dead.

But could these eye-witness testimonies have been nothing more than
hallucinations? Not many people are subject to hallucinations, and hallucinations
are very individualistic. Groups of people don’t have the same hallucinations.
Groups of people don’t have the same hallucination in different times and places.
Besides, hallucinations oftentimes occur when there is an expected, long-desired
event. People will sometimes see what they strongly desire to see. But the disciples
and others weren’t expecting these appearances. They were ready to move on with
their lives.

Then one must ask, if Jesus never rose from the dead, why did the disciples gather
for worship on Sunday rather than the Sabbath? The early church members were
mostly Jewish who observed the 7th day Sabbath. Something must have led them
to change the day of worship to the first day of the week.

If Jesus never rose from the dead, how else can you explain the early growth of the
church and even the large number of priests who “became obedient to the
faith” (Acts 6:7)? And these priests were not “friendly” to Jesus or his message
when he was alive. Something very dramatic must have happened for them to
change their views about Jesus.

If Jesus never rose from the dead, what else can explain how a small group of timid
men could dramatically change to the point of turning the world upside down (Acts
17:6)? What changed Peter who denied his Lord before a servant girl’s
questionings, into a man who could preach the Gospel before the powerful
Sanhedrin (Acts 4:7)?

What changed James, the Lord’s brother into a believer and later the leader of the
Jerusalem church? And what changed Paul the persecutor of the church into its
apostle to the Gentiles?

Why would apostles pray, Maranatha, “Our Lord, Come,” (I Cor. 16:22) if he was
still in the grave?

The only reasonable explanation as to what happened to Jesus is that he was
severely beaten and executed by professional executioners, and that he rose again
from the dead, just as Scripture says.

But is it so important that he rose from the dead, as Scripture says? Yes. If he
hadn’t then we can’t trust the Bible. If we can’t believe what it says about the death
and resurrection of Jesus, how can we believe the rest of it?

If Jesus didn’t die and didn’t rise from the dead, then our faith is in vain, and the
religion of Christianity is a hoax (I Cor. 15:15). If the resurrection story is myth,
then millions of people have been duped over the centuries. We might as well shut
down all the churches, Bible colleges, and seminaries. The Vatican would have to
have a large yard sale in St. Peters’ Square to sell all of the artwork, sculptures,
ancient documents, etc. Todays’ Christians, anticipating the second coming of the
Messiah, would probably convert to Judaism and wait for his first coming. Some
Jews might mock us, saying, “We told you so.”

If Jesus did not die and rise from the dead, then our view of Jesus must change.
Like a scandalized televangelist who is exposed for being a fraud, we must
conclude that Jesus himself was a fraud. Jesus told us that he would lay down his
life and raise it up again (John 2:19). He gave us the sign of Jonah, saying that he
would be in the grave for three days, then rise up again (Matt. 12:40). He said that
he must suffer, die and rise again (Mark 8:31). He said that he had the power to
lay down his life and to take it up again (John 10:18). If he didn’t do these things,
as he said he would, then he was a pathological liar, not God in the flesh. Jesus
would be just one of many false Messiahs to have come along.

As C.S. Lewis said, Jesus was either a lunatic, a liar, or the LORD. This
Resurrection Sunday, you can sing songs of his resurrection with greater
confidence knowing that the only reasonable explanation as to what really
happened was exactly what is in the Bible. It is not a belief that has to be accepted
with blind faith. If someone expresses doubt in the resurrection of Jesus, ask him if
there is a more reasonable explanation as to what happened than what is in the
Bible. I don’t think there is one.

He is Risen . . . Maranatha.

Recent Articles

29 Mar, 2024
Purim is a Jewish celebration, more like the Fourth of July or Mother’s Day, than a religious holiday like Passover. Purin is usually observed in February or March of each year. The word Purim means, “lots” as in a lottery, which was the means that the villainous Haman, an Amalekite, used to set the date for the massacre of Jews in Persia (previously Babylon). These events in the Book of Esther take place between chapters six and seven of the Book of Ezra. The setting is Persia, seventy years after they were taken into captivity by the Babylonians. Israel spent 70 years in captivity in Babylon, which was later taken over by the Persians in 539 B.C. Just a year later, the Persian King Cyrus decreed throughout his empire that any captive Jews in Babylonia who desired could return to Jerusalem to rebuild the temple. Cyrus even allowed the vessels of gold and silver stolen by Nebuchadnezzar’s troops to be returned. As we will read in Isaiah 48 , they all should have left, but some stayed behind. Let’s look at the cast of characters in this drama. The villain in the story was Haman, an Amalekite. The Amalekites were descendants of Esau, Jacob’s brother. You might recall that these siblings had a long-standing conflict that revolved around the birthright. Esau, the firstborn, sold his birthright to his brother Jacob. The hostility that Jacob and Esau had for one another carried on through the generations like a bad gene. Esau had a grandson named Amalek, from which we get the name Amalekites. These cousins of the Israelites attacked them whenever they had the chance. When the Jews were led out of Egypt by Moses, the Amalekites attacked them in Rephidim, in the Sinai Desert. This unprovoked attack led God to promise to blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven (Ex. 17:8-14) . Forty years later, in his last major speech to his people, Moses reminded the Jews of the command to go after Amalek (Deut. 25:17-19) . Saul, the first King of Israel, was commanded to wipe out the Amalekites (I Sam. 15:2-3) . But Saul disobeyed and spared the life of King Agag (I Sam 15:9) . This led to the premature end of the reign of Saul (I Sam. 15:23) . Saul, realizing his mistake, subsequently did kill Agag, but one of his sons survived. So not only was he disobedient, but he was also incompetent. Some 500 years later, one of his descendants was Haman. Others in the cast of characters included the royal couple, King Xerxes (some think it was King Ahasuerus or perhaps both names refer to the same person), and Queen Vashti. Then there was Esther, the Jewish maiden, and her uncle Mordecai. And so, with the setting in place, the cast of characters on stage, let the drama that led to Purim begin.

Job

29 Mar, 2024
JOB SUFFERS AND DEMANDS FROM GOD AN EXPLANATION AS TO “WHY?”
25 Mar, 2024
Ezra Comes to Jerusalem and Teaches the People
20 Mar, 2024
The Miracle of Passover: Zola Levitt
13 Feb, 2024
The Jews Journey to Jerusalem
12 Feb, 2024
The Israelites Head for Jerusalem and Rebuild their Temple.
18 Dec, 2023
How Israelites Should Behave When They Return Home
05 Dec, 2023
December 7-15, 2023, is Hanukkah (Festival of Lights)
25 Oct, 2023
Chapter 22: The Book of the Law was Found, Josiah leads a Return to God
20 Oct, 2023
Chapter 24: Judah is Taken into Captivity
Show More

Share this:

Start Here...

Why Study the Bible?


Don’t many consider the Bible to be just a book of myths? Why do we read the Bible rather than the sacred literature of other religions?


How do we know that it is from God? How do we know that what we have today is an accurate translation from the original? Is the Bible complete or have there been some books that have been lost?


We should be able to answer these questions, and there are answers! So start here!

Learn More

Answers to Common Bible Questions

17 Dec, 2021
Lent is a six week period of spiritual devotion starting on Ash Wednesday and ending at Easter. Those who observe Lent usually give up something for Lent. Some might give up coffee, or soda pop, or alcohol, or chocolate. May I suggest that you give up something that will really impress God and make this season of Lent one of the most memorable and meaningful seasons of your life?  May I suggest that if you are giving up something, why not give up some of the acts of our sinful nature mentioned in Gal. 5:19? Why don’t we give up lying about others? Do you think you can give up the hate you feel towards others? How about envy, can we work on putting envy aside this year? How about giving up on the naïve idea that all pastors are mature Christian leaders whose word should always be accepted, rather than wolfs in sheep’s clothing (Matt 7:15). How about giving up the idea that everyone in church is a real Christian (Matt 7:21-23). How about giving up your desire to seek revenge on those who have hurt you (Matt 18:21-22)? If you are insecure and feel threatened when you see the success of others in ministry, how about giving up efforts to hinder others who have been called to minister (Rom 12:4-8)? Of course it is easier to give up something like chocolate, etc. and make yourself feel like you are doing something that is pleasing to God. If you are not willing to give up unchristian behavior, might I suggest something that will really please God this Lent? Give up all evidence of your profession of Christian faith, such as books, pictures and jewelry. Don’t talk about God, Jesus or the Church. I think God would appreciate it if you would stop giving HIM a bad name by the way you live. Let’s give up what hinders our witness and become a better ambassador for Christ (2 Cor 5:20) this Lenten season.
17 Dec, 2021
In Matthew 2:1-2 is says that the magi saw "His star in the east." What was this star that guided these men to Jesus? Some have suggested that it could have been a comet, an asteroid, or perhaps a meteor or an especially bright star. The problem with these suggestions is that these physical things either quickly move across the sky and then disappear or are too far away to provide directions with any precision. It would be hard to get directions from such objects. The "star" had to move constantly or intermittently at the same pace as the magi. Then it says that it hovered over the house where Mary and Joseph had moved to with Jesus. It hardly sounds like a comet or meteor or a star as we know them. Can you think of another time that people in the Bible were guided by some form of light? How about the time when Moses was leading the Israelites out of Egypt? He didn't have a global positioning system with him. He did have a pillar of fire that led him at night (Ex 13:21-22). We see this light in Solomon's Temple (2 Chron 7:1-3) and when the Jews were about to go into Babylonian captivity, we see it leaving the Temple (Ezek 9-11). In the New Testament we see it at the birth of Jesus (Luke 2:9) at His transfiguration (Matt 17:5) and His ascension (Acts 1:9).  What exactly was this guiding light? The word "star" can also be translated as "radiance." It appears that it was this "radiance" that guided Moses and the magi. The Jews call this the "Shekinah", a physical manifestation of the glory of God in the form of a supernatural radiance. This, I believe, is what the Star of Bethlehem was.
17 Dec, 2021
Imagine that you are the pastor of a church. A young married couple is having some difficulties in their relationship and they seek counsel from you. On Monday the wife comes in to give her assessment of their marriage. What do you think she will say? She might say that she is a hardworking, caring and supportive wife and that it is her husband who is the neglectful, insensitive brute and the source of all problems in the marriage. You feel so sorry for this wife and when you see her husband in the hallway, you think to yourself, "What a jerk." On Friday the husband comes in and gives his assessment of the marriage. He tells you that he is hard working and very generous and that she is the major problem in the relationship. As the pastor, you are wondering if they both are talking about the same marriage. Each person tells you what makes them look best and their spouse the worst. Where is the truth? The truth is probably somewhere in between  Proverbs 18:17 says, "The first to present his case seems right, til another comes forward and questions him." There are conflicts in all relationships, between spouses, parents and children, employees and employers. When you hear one side of a story, don’t assume that what you hear is the complete truth. And don’t pass on to someone else what you have heard. Probably, at least some of what you heard is untrue to gain your support in a conflict.
More Posts
Share by: