Genesis Chapter 4: Adam and Eve have children.
Here is a trivia question for you. What was the name of the first child born to Adam and Eve? Did you answer Cain? You might be correct. Biblically speaking though, the term “firstborn” can mean chronologically first, but it can also mean first in the sense of status or importance. A couple could have daughters, but the first son to be born is oftentimes referred to as the “firstborn.” I know, that doesn’t seem fair.
Tragedy strikes the “First Family.”
News Flash: Mr. Abel, son of Mr. and Mrs. Adam and Eve, was found dead on his farm yesterday. His brother, Cain has been identified as a “person of interest.” The investigation continues.”
Gen. 4:8, Cain kills his brother Abel. He was jealous of him because his offering to God was acceptable while Cain’s was not. It wasn’t the offering that was wrong, but the attitude in which it was given. Worship that pleases God must come from a pure heart, not a resentful one out of obligation. Cain had a bad attitude towards honoring God and he resented his brothers’ devotion to Him. God comes along and asks Cain, “Where’s your brother?” Cain says, “I don’t know. It’s not my turn to babysit him.” Or something like that. God sentences Cain to be a “restless wanderer on the earth,”
(4:13). When sentence is passed Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is more than I can bear.” It might be read, “My sin is more than I can bear.” Literally is reads, “my iniquity.” This could mean that he felt that his sin was too great to forgive, an expression of remorse.
Gen. 4:12, “You will be a restless wanderer on the earth. . .
verse 15, “If anyone kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Cain is being banished from the community much as Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden. The Lord’s response was one of mercy and protection suggests that Cain’s words, “my iniquity is more than I can bear” was an expression of repentance.
All five books of Moses, Genesis to Deuteronomy, you will find that murder is a capital offense. So why wasn’t Cain killed? Up to now, had anyone died? Might Cain been unaware that what he did would lead to the death of Abel? Was the charge reduced from first degree murder to manslaughter? It’s interesting when a story is told without the details, we tend to fill in the blanks with speculation. I guess we know as much as we need to know.
Do you think Adam and Eve told the kids about their early years in the Garden and their actions that got them kicked out? Can you imagine the kids saying, “Our stupid parents! If it weren’t for them, we would be living on easy street instead of doing all this work on the bad side of town.” Don’t you feel bad for the parents? Not only did they lose their luxurious accommodations in the Garden of Eden, one son is murdered by the other and the guilty one is sent away. It’s as if they lost both sons.
Gen. 4:19 introduces us to the first polygamist. His name was Lamech. He was a very violent a vengeful person; not the kind of guy you want as your neighbor. He says, “I have killed a man for wounding me, a young man for injuring me. If Cain is avenged seven times, then Lamech seventy-seven times.” Hold on there Lamech, do you think you overreacted a bit here? Isn’t an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth a more just idea?
Jesus referred to Lamech attitude in
Matt 18:21-22. Peter asked Jesus how many times he must forgive someone. Jesus said, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.” The point that he was making is that Peter should be as willing to forgive someone as Lamech was willing to destroy someone.
Genesis 6: Sons of God and Daughters of Men and Noah builds a Boat
This chapter contains a story that, as one commentator wrote, “. . . has had many diverse interpretations.” That is an understatement.
Genesis 6:2-7 it says that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal, his days will be a hundred and twenty years. The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and also afterward-when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.”
Verse 7, so the Lord said, “I will wipe mankind, whom I have created, from the face of the earth.”
Who were the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men?” Who were the Nephilim and why was God so angry with them that he decided to destroy all mankind? For years I thought that the sons of God were the godly descendants of Seth, and the daughters of men were the ungodly descendants of Cain. But would this bring down the wrath of God upon all mankind? It had to be something more serious than that.
Perhaps there is another explanation, one that better explains God’s anger and the reason why some demons are already in hell, waiting for their roommates to show up in
(Rev 20:10).
The sons of God can be angels. In the Old Testament the phrase “sons of God” always refers to angels
(Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7). What do we know about angels? We know that they are always referred to as males, not females or sexless creatures. It appears that angels can manifest themselves as human beings. In Hebrews it says that we should be kind to strangers because in this way we might entertain angels without knowing it
(Heb. 13:2). An angel appeared in human form at the tomb of Jesus
(Mark 16:5). Another piece to this puzzle is found in II Peter 2:4-5 where it says, “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned,
(Gen 6?) but sent them to hell (tartarus), putting them into gloomy dungeons to be held for judgment; if he did not spare the ancient world when he brought the flood on its ungodly people . . .”
Another clue comes from
Jude 6,7, “And the angels who did not keep their position of authority but abandoned their own home-these he has kept in darkness (tartarus), bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day. In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion.”
Putting these passages together, as pieces of a puzzle, we find that the sin that these angels committed was similar to those in Sodom and Gomorrah; they went after “strange flesh.” It appears that some fallen angels (demons) sinned in such a way, before the flood, that God had to send them to hell ahead of time.
This may have been Satan’s attempt to corrupt the Seed of woman by having some of his fallen angels (demons) take on human form and intermarry with humankind. When God said that he “would not contend with man forever, for he is mortal,” it means that he would not continue to tolerate this evil, and the flood would come to destroy the product of these unions (called Nephilim). The term Nephilim means “fallen ones.” The term is sometimes translated “giants,” but more accurately it should be fallen ones, some type of superhuman, but not necessarily giant in size.
Critics of this view might say that Jesus said that in the kingdom, humans will be like angels in that they will not marry in the resurrection
(Matt 22:30; Luke 20:36). Yes, but this does not prevent them from having married humans in this life. Jesus is speaking of the afterlife in these passages, not in the physical world.
Scholars can find problems with both explanations as to what was going on here. But the idea that fallen angels, who took on human form and impregnated women, strange as it sounds, has fewer problems than the idea that descendants of Cain intermarried with the descendants of Abel. The first hypothesis better explains the binding of some of the demons in hell and the coming destruction of humans by way of the flood.
Chapter 6 continues with the story of Noah’s Ark and the worldwide flood. Scholars are not in agreement as to whether this flood was a local one or worldwide. I tend to believe that it was a worldwide flood. If it was only a local flood, Noah would have been told, “Head for higher ground!” rather than “Build a huge boat.” Also, a local flood would not have killed most of human life, only those in the area of the flood.
We don’t know the topography of the earth back then. Or the weather patterns. It might be more difficult for us to imagine what happened.
How long was Noah and his family in the Ark? They were in it for a total of 377-378 days. Would you need to stay that long if it was a local flood? After the flood God promised to never again bring about such an event
(Gen 9:8). Haven’t we seen many local floods over the years? How do we explain fossils of sea life high in the mountains if this was a local flood? Perhaps they could be explained by huge plate of the earth rise up over time which pushed the remains of sea life to what would become mountain tops.
Another question asked of critics is, “How could Noah get all the animals on the ark?” Well, some were baby animals, some were even just eggs, and he didn’t have to get every species, only a pair of each kind. Even a pair of dinosaurs might be only the size of a couple of chickens.
If you look at the dimensions of the ark, it was huge with many levels. And if God could lead the animals to the Ark, He could also put them into a state of hibernation. This would mean that Noah would have less work to do (feeding and cleaning up after them) and more space for animals. Or room for a basketball court, game room and other amenities (wine cellar?). After all, they were going to be on this vessel for a long time.