THE Berean
Bible Ministry

Ecclesiastes

ECCLESIASTES

SOLOMON’S LIFE REVIEW

The Book of Ecclesiastes is in many ways very different from every other book of the Bible. Yet it is certainly a part of the Word of God. Paul tells us that all Scripture s inspired by God and is profitable.


Ecclesiastes is in many ways an enigmatic book, liberally sprinkled with contradictions. Unless we understand exactly what it is that God is trying to show us, we can easily misunderstand the purpose of this book.


So let's start by taking a closer look at Solomon's situation at the time when he wrote this book.



SOLOMON'S OWN SITUATION

It should be quite clear that this book was written at the time when God ... "WAS ANGRY WITH SOLOMON"! This is important to understand. Here we have a book of the Bible that was written by someone with whom God, at the time of writing this book, was ANGRY, as is stated very plainly in 1 Kings 11:9.


THAT IS THE MIND WHICH PRODUCED THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES!


Solomon himself was no longer obeying God when he wrote this book. And he knew that God was angry with him. At the time of writing this book Solomon had experienced as much as he felt he could possibly have experienced. His view is very humanistic. 


Solomon is an older man at this time. If you have ever taken a psychology course then you are familiar with the work of Eric Erickson. He came up with a psychosocial theory of development where he says we go through stages in our lives when issued need to be examined and resolved. One such stage that we are probably most familiar with is the state of identity versus role confusion which we deal with in our teen years. It is during this time we ask ourselves, “Who am I? What am I to do with my life?”


The last stage in development, according to Erickson, is the stage of Ego integrity vs. despair. This stage occurs in our later years, 65 and on. This is when we reflect back on our lives and wonder if we really made a difference for good.


Solomon is looking back as all of his victories and his failures and is probably not very pleased with what he sees. In one passage he refers to himself as a foolish king.


THE CONCLUSION

Solomon reaches is greatly influenced by his humanistic perspective. And that conclusion is that EVERYTHING is futile and empty and without meaning in the long run. Vanity of vanities, says the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all [is] vanity. (Ecclesiastes 1:2)


AT NO STAGE does Solomon claim to present a godly perspective! He does not claim to speak FOR God and he does not claim to present God's point of view in this whole question. It is his personal view which is presented in this book. And we need to read it as such!


The whole Book of Ecclesiastes only contains 222 verses. And in this book Solomon uses the personal pronoun "I" 87 times in 65 different verses. Thus on average he uses the pronoun "I" two times for every five verses. It is a very egocentric view, all about him.


In other books of the Old Testament (excluding the ones Solomon authored) the use of the pronoun "I" most often refers to GOD, where the prophet is quoting the words of God.


The experiments Solomon conducted in his quest for happiness were all conducted from the platform of selfishness.


Solomon's OPINIONS were inevitably influenced by his own spiritual state. He had compromised with idolatry and knew that God was displeased with him and yet he appears unwilling to repent and to seek forgiveness.


And that is precisely why Solomon's personal views and opinions are invariably in conflict with a godly perspective.


Let's now look at some examples in this Book of Ecclesiastes.


SOME POINTS OF INCONSISTENCY


1) Regarding life and death: On the one hand Solomon says that it is better to be dead than to be alive; and it is still better to never have existed in the first place.


Ecc 4:2 “I declared that the dead, who had already died, are happier than the living, who are still alive.”


Ecc 7:1 “A good name is better than fine perfume, and the day of death better than the day of birth.”


Is it really true that it is better to have never been born or to have died than to life? 


BUT ON THE OTHER HAND Solomon urges us to make the effort to not die before our time (why, if death is really better?).


Ecc 7:17 “Do not be over righteous, neither be overwise-why destroy yourself? Do not be over wicked, and do not be a fool- why dies before your time?”


Really? Let’s not seek righteousness or wisdom? Don’t die before your time? But if death is better than life, why not die sooner than later?


And then he refers to death as "an evil"


Ecc 9:3-4 “The heart of man is full of evil and there is madness in their hearts while they live, and afterward they join the dead. Anyone who is among the living has hope-even a live dog is better off than a dead man.”


So what do we have in these above inconsistencies? When Solomon is negative about life, he is expressing his own opinions, based on his own spiritual circumstances at that time. That was how he PERSONALLY perceived life. And when he speaks positively about life, then he is being more objective.


2) Regarding the value of working: On the one hand Solomon says that all of life is useless, empty and of no value.


Ecc 1:2 “meaningless, meaningless, all is meaningless.”


Then he says that at first he REJOICED in his labor.


Ecc 2:10 “I denied myself nothing my eyes desired; I refused my heart no pleasure. My heart took delight in all my work, and this was the reward for all my labor.”


But that rejoicing wore off after a little while and then he HATED all his own work and achievements.


Ecc 2:18, 20 “I hated all the things I had toiled for under the sun, because I must leave them to the one who comes after me. So my heart began to despair over all my toilsome labor under the sun.”


The term under the sun refers to things of this world. In other words, if this is all there is, if there is nothing beyond this life, why bother to go through the trials and troubles when we are all going to die, just like an animal?


And his conclusion was that the best you can possibly do is live for the moment.


Ecc 2:24 “A man can do nothing better than to eat and drink and find satisfaction in his work.”


Ecc 3:11-12 “He has set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end. I know that there is nothing better for men than to be happy and do good while they live.”


But why do good in this life? Why not simply focus on your own needs if there is no reward or punishment after this life?


Ecc 3:22 “So I saw that there is nothing better for a man than to enjoy his work, because that is his lot. For who can bring him to see what will happen after him?”


But on the other hand he said it is better for us to be mourning than rejoicing.


Ecc 7:2-3“It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting, for death is the destiny of every man; the living should take this to heart. Sorrow is better than laughter, because a sad face is good for the heart.”


Again, these inconsistencies reflect Solomon's own thinking. His negative attitude about his own works and achievements (which included the incredible privilege to have built the Temple for God) reflects his own perspective, where he knew the future held no hope for him without genuine repentance. His future was very bleak. Where he speaks positively about us putting our whole hearts into our every activity he is again speaking more objectively without letting his own situation totally obscure what is really right in God's sight. Clearly Solomon was being "double minded".


3) Regarding himself: On the one hand Solomon KNEW that the best thing anyone can do is to fear God.


Ecc 8:123 “I know that it will go better with God-fearing men, who are reverent before God.”


He says the same thing at the end of the book. Ecc 12:13 “Here is the conclusion of the matter; Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.”


It seems that Solomon is much like all of us. We all know better than we do. We all know what we should do to remain healthy, watch your diet, exercise, avoid stress, etc. But neither of us lives up to our own knowledge and standards. Solomon knew better and he admits it.


Ecc 4:13 “Better a poor but wise youth than an old but foolish king who no longer knows how to take warning.”


He is here speaking from personal experience! He is admitting that he himself no longer accepted admonitions. And that is why God was angry with him. And in so doing he still recognized that this made him "a FOOLISH king", but he wasn't going to change.


4) Regarding the value of wisdom: On the one hand Solomon stated that wisdom only brings grief and sorrow.


Ecc 1:18 “For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief.”


This is in contradiction to what he wrote in the first two chapters of Proverbs where he extols the virtues of wisdom and urges us to seek it.


He continues to question that the wise person has any advantage...


Ecc 6:8 “What advantage has a wise man over a fool?


In Proverbs 3:2 he wrote that being wise will “prolong your life many years and bring you prosperity.”


BUT ON THE OTHER HAND he states that wisdom excels folly.


Ecc 2:13 I saw that wisdom is better than folly, just as light is better than darkness.”


He also says that wisdom makes one wise man more powerful than ten rulers in a city (Ecc 7:19).


Solomon claims that he himself was wise.


Ecc 12:9 “Not only was (notice the past tense) the Teacher wise, but also he imparted knowledge to the people.”


Yet he admitted that he was, at this point in life, a foolish king (Ecc 4:13).


Again, on this subject of wisdom Solomon displays an inconsistency, vacillating between what he knew deep-down was right (that wisdom is good), and what he personally felt (wisdom hadn't helped him to remain a person of integrity).


5) Regarding the wicked: On the one hand Solomon says that the wicked prolong their lives.


Ecc 7:15 “I have seen both of these: a righteous man perishing in his righteousness, and a wicked man living long in his wickedness.”


BUT ON THE OTHER HAND he says the wicked can't prolong their lives.


Ecc 8:13 “I know that it will go better with God-fearing men, who are reverent before God. Yet because the wicked do not fear God, it will not go well with them, and their days will not lengthen like a shadow.”


Again, he has given the observation that the wicked sometimes SEEM to get away with it. But he actually knew quite well that the wicked don't really prolong their lives. He probably realized that his own life was coming to an end, and there was nothing he felt he could do to change that. Repentance doesn't enter the picture anywhere in this discussion.


6) Regarding how we should view sorrow: On the one hand Solomon says that sorrow is better than joy and laughter.


Ecc 7:3 “Sorrow is better than laughter.”


BUT ON THE OTHER HAND he also says that we should REMOVE sorrow from our lives. But why remove it, if it is really better?


Ecc 11:10 “So then, banish anxiety from your heart and cast off the troubles of your body, for youth and vigor are meaningless.”


These are all examples of some of the inconsistencies that Solomon presents in this book.


SOLOMON'S VERY SELFISH WAYS

Notice how Solomon approached life in his later years. He demonstrated no restraint on his desires. There would be no one to question his actions or challenge him in any way. He was a powerful king with great wealth, who could say “no” to him (Ecc 8:4)?


He also hated the idea that his son would inherit all of his things.


He wasn’t concerned about his many wives or his children. Ecc 7:26 “I find more bitter than death the woman who is a snare; whose heart is a trap and whose hands are chains.”  He was more concerned that someone might outdo him. Ecc 2:12 “What more can the king’s successor do than what has already been done?


How bitter was it for the women to share one man with 999 other women? Solomon was just thinking of himself, that's all!


Solomon then continued to encourage an "eat-drink-and-be-merry" attitude.


Ecc 8:15 “So I commend the enjoyment of life, because nothing is better for a man under the sun than to eat and drink and be glad.”


That is the type of excuse carnal people put into practice all the time. And they have Solomon's endorsement. 


SOLOMON'S VERY NEGATIVE APPROACH TO LIFE

Ecc 9:11 “The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned, but time and chance happens to them all.”


THIS STATEMENT IS NOT TRUE!!


Yes, there are some occasions when someone just gets lucky. There are others where those who obey the rules find life going against them. But in general, those who do work hard and do what is right succeed in life. There is a direct connection between success and the amount of effort we are willing to expend. So Solomon's statement is the typical negative view put forward by those who fail.


Next Solomon gives the most negative view of old age that you could possibly come up with. His claim is that old age consists of "EVIL DAYS" and years in which we no longer have any pleasures.


Ecc 12 gives a very depressing description of old age. But, I ask, did Moses or Caleb fit this picture? 


There is absolutely no justification for Solomon's negative view of life throughout the Book of Ecclesiastes. Solomon had every possible blessing he could have wanted. The views he expresses are a way of justifying his own lifestyle.


Let's now notice where Solomon's statements are CLEARLY contrary to God's ways.


SOLOMON'S VIEWS ARE CONTRARY TO GOD'S WAYS!


1) SOLOMON praises the dead because he sees no purpose in trials. His is a selfish view (Eccl. 4:2).


GOD TELLS US TO CHOOSE LIFE (Deuteronomy 30:19), that death is a penalty for sins (see Romans 6:23), that death is an enemy (see 1 Corinthians 15:26).


2) SOLOMON praises those who have never yet had the misfortune to live (Eccl. 4:3). This view is utterly absurd!


GOD TELLS US that He is not willing that any should perish (2 Peter 3:9) and that He wants all human beings to attain unto salvation (1Timothy 2:4).


3) SOLOMON asserts that a miscarriage (an aborted fetus) is better than not having a decent burial (Ecc 6:3).


This view is again absurd! It is the expression of the vanity of a king. Notice the use of "I SAY"!


GOD TELLS US that a burial has absolutely no consequences on a future life (Hebrews 11:36-39). According to Solomon's view some of the apostles who were not given a proper burial are worse off than an aborted fetus.


4) SOLOMON asserts that the dead have no more a reward to look forward to.


“For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything” (Ecc 9:5). This passage is used to support the false idea of “soul sleep”, a state of unconsciousness after death.


GOD TELLS US that the time for our reward is most assuredly AFTER this physical life (Revelation 11:18). Paul explained that “if in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable” (1 Corinthians 15:19).


5) SOLOMON says that there is a time to hate.


A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace. (Ecc 3:8)


In saying this Solomon is using nothing more than human reasoning.


JESUS CHRIST SAID very plainly that we are not to hate.


Matt 5:44 Jesus says that we are to love our enemies and bless those who curse you.


6) SOLOMON claims that a miscarriage is better off because it will never have to face problems, because problems are bad, not allowing us to rest (Ecc 6:5).


JESUS tells us to be of good cheer in spite of problems that may come our way (John 16:33). And James tells us that we should count it all joy when we are accorded the privilege of suffering trials (James 1:2).


7) SOLOMON claims there is nothing better we can do than to look at the physical, the here and now (Ecc 3:22).


JESUS CHRIST SAID that it is far better if we "deny the self" and resist the pulls of our physical natures (Matt 16:24).


8) SOLOMON denies that there is a great purpose for life and urges us to live for the here and now Ecc 9:9).


GOD TELLS US through the Apostle Peter that we should focus on the future inheritance, which God has prepared for us (I Peter 1).


9) SOLOMON claims that anger and vexation are better than joy and laughter (Ecc 7:3).


Yet Paul tells us to rejoice in the Lord (Philippians 4:4).


10) SOLOMON introduces the concept that human beings are no better than "beasts" and have no preeminence above beasts (Ecc 3).


GOD TELLS US that it is our potential to rule over all things with Jesus Christ, an infinite "preeminence" above beasts (Heb 2).


11) SOLOMON claims that life is empty and unsatisfactory (Ecc 2:1).


None of God's servants would have described their own existences in these words. That is not the way Paul saw it, when he said that he had fought a good fight (2 Timothy 4:7). Paul clearly felt that it was worth it! Paul also told us that it is our potential to be the heirs of God (Romans 8:16-18), a far cry from "all being vanity".


WHY GOD WANTED THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES IN THE BIBLE

Solomon really became very negative about life, because for him, as he looked back on his life, he recognized so many missed opportunities. 


Briefly, here are some lessons we can learn from this book:


1) Sin always makes people negative. Obedience to God, on the other hand, makes people positive about life. Solomon didn't have a fraction of the trials that the Apostle Paul had to face; yet Paul was positive and Solomon was negative.


2) Getting everything you desire is not the best way to achieve happiness in life. Happiness also includes self-denial and self- control. We talk about people who get everything they desire as being "spoiled rotten" ... and usually they are not really happy.


3) Ecclesiastes shows what happens to the mind of a person who knowingly rejects the truth of God in order to compromise.


4) Ecclesiastes gives us the opportunity to compare God's wisdom and perspective with the best that worldly wisdom.


For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. (1 Corinthians 3:19)

Next: Exodus [LINK]

Recent Articles

29 Mar, 2024
Purim is a Jewish celebration, more like the Fourth of July or Mother’s Day, than a religious holiday like Passover. Purin is usually observed in February or March of each year. The word Purim means, “lots” as in a lottery, which was the means that the villainous Haman, an Amalekite, used to set the date for the massacre of Jews in Persia (previously Babylon). These events in the Book of Esther take place between chapters six and seven of the Book of Ezra. The setting is Persia, seventy years after they were taken into captivity by the Babylonians. Israel spent 70 years in captivity in Babylon, which was later taken over by the Persians in 539 B.C. Just a year later, the Persian King Cyrus decreed throughout his empire that any captive Jews in Babylonia who desired could return to Jerusalem to rebuild the temple. Cyrus even allowed the vessels of gold and silver stolen by Nebuchadnezzar’s troops to be returned. As we will read in Isaiah 48 , they all should have left, but some stayed behind. Let’s look at the cast of characters in this drama. The villain in the story was Haman, an Amalekite. The Amalekites were descendants of Esau, Jacob’s brother. You might recall that these siblings had a long-standing conflict that revolved around the birthright. Esau, the firstborn, sold his birthright to his brother Jacob. The hostility that Jacob and Esau had for one another carried on through the generations like a bad gene. Esau had a grandson named Amalek, from which we get the name Amalekites. These cousins of the Israelites attacked them whenever they had the chance. When the Jews were led out of Egypt by Moses, the Amalekites attacked them in Rephidim, in the Sinai Desert. This unprovoked attack led God to promise to blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven (Ex. 17:8-14) . Forty years later, in his last major speech to his people, Moses reminded the Jews of the command to go after Amalek (Deut. 25:17-19) . Saul, the first King of Israel, was commanded to wipe out the Amalekites (I Sam. 15:2-3) . But Saul disobeyed and spared the life of King Agag (I Sam 15:9) . This led to the premature end of the reign of Saul (I Sam. 15:23) . Saul, realizing his mistake, subsequently did kill Agag, but one of his sons survived. So not only was he disobedient, but he was also incompetent. Some 500 years later, one of his descendants was Haman. Others in the cast of characters included the royal couple, King Xerxes (some think it was King Ahasuerus or perhaps both names refer to the same person), and Queen Vashti. Then there was Esther, the Jewish maiden, and her uncle Mordecai. And so, with the setting in place, the cast of characters on stage, let the drama that led to Purim begin.

Job

29 Mar, 2024
JOB SUFFERS AND DEMANDS FROM GOD AN EXPLANATION AS TO “WHY?”
25 Mar, 2024
Did it Really Happen? Does it Really Matter?
25 Mar, 2024
Ezra Comes to Jerusalem and Teaches the People
20 Mar, 2024
The Miracle of Passover: Zola Levitt
13 Feb, 2024
The Jews Journey to Jerusalem
12 Feb, 2024
The Israelites Head for Jerusalem and Rebuild their Temple.
18 Dec, 2023
How Israelites Should Behave When They Return Home
05 Dec, 2023
December 7-15, 2023, is Hanukkah (Festival of Lights)
25 Oct, 2023
Chapter 22: The Book of the Law was Found, Josiah leads a Return to God
Show More

Share this:

Start Here...

Why Study the Bible?


Don’t many consider the Bible to be just a book of myths? Why do we read the Bible rather than the sacred literature of other religions?


How do we know that it is from God? How do we know that what we have today is an accurate translation from the original? Is the Bible complete or have there been some books that have been lost?


We should be able to answer these questions, and there are answers! So start here!

Learn More

Answers to Common Bible Questions

17 Dec, 2021
Lent is a six week period of spiritual devotion starting on Ash Wednesday and ending at Easter. Those who observe Lent usually give up something for Lent. Some might give up coffee, or soda pop, or alcohol, or chocolate. May I suggest that you give up something that will really impress God and make this season of Lent one of the most memorable and meaningful seasons of your life?  May I suggest that if you are giving up something, why not give up some of the acts of our sinful nature mentioned in Gal. 5:19? Why don’t we give up lying about others? Do you think you can give up the hate you feel towards others? How about envy, can we work on putting envy aside this year? How about giving up on the naïve idea that all pastors are mature Christian leaders whose word should always be accepted, rather than wolfs in sheep’s clothing (Matt 7:15). How about giving up the idea that everyone in church is a real Christian (Matt 7:21-23). How about giving up your desire to seek revenge on those who have hurt you (Matt 18:21-22)? If you are insecure and feel threatened when you see the success of others in ministry, how about giving up efforts to hinder others who have been called to minister (Rom 12:4-8)? Of course it is easier to give up something like chocolate, etc. and make yourself feel like you are doing something that is pleasing to God. If you are not willing to give up unchristian behavior, might I suggest something that will really please God this Lent? Give up all evidence of your profession of Christian faith, such as books, pictures and jewelry. Don’t talk about God, Jesus or the Church. I think God would appreciate it if you would stop giving HIM a bad name by the way you live. Let’s give up what hinders our witness and become a better ambassador for Christ (2 Cor 5:20) this Lenten season.
17 Dec, 2021
In Matthew 2:1-2 is says that the magi saw "His star in the east." What was this star that guided these men to Jesus? Some have suggested that it could have been a comet, an asteroid, or perhaps a meteor or an especially bright star. The problem with these suggestions is that these physical things either quickly move across the sky and then disappear or are too far away to provide directions with any precision. It would be hard to get directions from such objects. The "star" had to move constantly or intermittently at the same pace as the magi. Then it says that it hovered over the house where Mary and Joseph had moved to with Jesus. It hardly sounds like a comet or meteor or a star as we know them. Can you think of another time that people in the Bible were guided by some form of light? How about the time when Moses was leading the Israelites out of Egypt? He didn't have a global positioning system with him. He did have a pillar of fire that led him at night (Ex 13:21-22). We see this light in Solomon's Temple (2 Chron 7:1-3) and when the Jews were about to go into Babylonian captivity, we see it leaving the Temple (Ezek 9-11). In the New Testament we see it at the birth of Jesus (Luke 2:9) at His transfiguration (Matt 17:5) and His ascension (Acts 1:9).  What exactly was this guiding light? The word "star" can also be translated as "radiance." It appears that it was this "radiance" that guided Moses and the magi. The Jews call this the "Shekinah", a physical manifestation of the glory of God in the form of a supernatural radiance. This, I believe, is what the Star of Bethlehem was.
17 Dec, 2021
Imagine that you are the pastor of a church. A young married couple is having some difficulties in their relationship and they seek counsel from you. On Monday the wife comes in to give her assessment of their marriage. What do you think she will say? She might say that she is a hardworking, caring and supportive wife and that it is her husband who is the neglectful, insensitive brute and the source of all problems in the marriage. You feel so sorry for this wife and when you see her husband in the hallway, you think to yourself, "What a jerk." On Friday the husband comes in and gives his assessment of the marriage. He tells you that he is hard working and very generous and that she is the major problem in the relationship. As the pastor, you are wondering if they both are talking about the same marriage. Each person tells you what makes them look best and their spouse the worst. Where is the truth? The truth is probably somewhere in between  Proverbs 18:17 says, "The first to present his case seems right, til another comes forward and questions him." There are conflicts in all relationships, between spouses, parents and children, employees and employers. When you hear one side of a story, don’t assume that what you hear is the complete truth. And don’t pass on to someone else what you have heard. Probably, at least some of what you heard is untrue to gain your support in a conflict.
More Posts
Share by: